mississippi The odd in opposite.
high-rollin: duchesssx: desertmanian: African American doctors attempting to save the life of a Klu Klux Klan member: This photo left me speechless, this is what respect is.  View high resolution

high-rollin:

duchesssx:

desertmanian:

African American doctors attempting to save the life of a Klu Klux Klan member:

This photo left me speechless, this is what respect is. 

(Source: jocelynbeexo)

bubonickitten:

help, i can’t stop laughing

View high resolution

(Source: 0mnis-e)

fuckyeahlaughters:

katzmatt:

fruk-more-like-frick-already:

taeyeon-9muses-rilakkuma-ohyeah:

Clever way of getting his features in there.

cr:  thqys

LITTLE FUCKING BEAR PANCAKES!

I WANT SOME SO I CAN DRENCH THEM IN MAPLE SYRUP OH MY GOD

THIS IS SO CUTE I DON’T EVEN LIKE PANCAKES

FUCKING BRILLANT

not funny but I worth reblogging!

tyleroakley:

Oops.

her face tho haha

The most painful thing is losing yourself in the process of loving someone too much, and forgetting that you are special too.
— Ernest Hemingway (via onlinecounsellingcollege)
thenewenlightenmentage: What are Quasars and Blazars? Blazars and quasars are both subclasses of active galactic nuclei (AGN). Blazars and quasars are intrinsically the same object — a supermassive black hole with a surrounding accretion disk, producing a jet — but seen at different orientation angles with respect to the jet’s axis.1 Quasar is short for Quasi Stellar Radio Source. History The discovery of Quasars in 1963 provided a final piece of evidence that undermined the Steady State theory of the universe, and supported the Big Bang.  Maarten Schmidt, a Caltech astronomer working at Mt. Palomar Observatory, was credited with discovering the most distant object observed to date—so bright that it was mistaken for a star; but it was billion light years away.  Because of the Doppler shift, the characteristic lines with which we identify stars were not at the expected wavelengths.    Schmidt’s discovery capped an exciting period in which the distance scale of the universe was expanded nearly tenfold, thanks to the contributions of Walter Baade, Alan Sandage, the new science of radio astronomy, and the magnificent telescopes of Mount Palomar. Not all radio sources can be seen in visible light.  Many are thought to be distant galaxies.  The Sun emits radio waves that are easily detected because it is so close to us, but most stars are not bright radio sources. In 1963 Maarten Schmidt was studying radio Source 3C 273.  It was unusual because the radio signals appeared to be coming from a star. At first the spectrum of the star was puzzling.   Schmidt could not figure out what elements produced the bight spectral lines.  Then he realized that the unfamiliar lines were simply the bright emission lines from hydrogen gas that had been shifted to different wavelengths. According to Hubble’s Law, an object with that red shift must be located billions of light-years away. It must be brighter than a million galaxies to appear as bright as a star at that great distance. 3C 273 came to be known as a quasar, short for quasi-stellar radio source, since it looks like a star, but cannot possibly be one since it is so bright.  In subsequent years many more quasars were found, including some much further away than 3C 273. These findings dealt a serious blow the Steady State theory, which proposed that the universe is more or less uniform, so that young galaxies should be distributed evenly, with some close and some far away.  If quasars are only found at great distances, they could very well be young galaxies, since we are seeing them much earlier in the history of the universe. (Light from an object a billion light years away takes a billion years to reach us.)  Therefore, Maarten Schmidt’s discovery of quasars added another important piece of evidence in favor of the Big Bang theory.  It also amazed the readers of Time magazine that astronomers could look so far away in space and time.2 Known Quasars and Blazars  PKS 1127-145 4 HE 1104-1805 5 The largest known structure in the universe is a large group of quasars rightly called the LQG (Large Quasar Group).  It’s four billion light-years from end to end! (Read More) For more Quasars click here. Some examples of blazars include 3C 454.3, 3C 273, BL Lacertae, PKS 2155-304, Markarian 421, and Markarian 501. The latter two are also called “TeV Blazars” for their high energy (teraelectron-volt range) gamma-ray emission.5 1 http://www.astronomy.com/en/News-Observing/Ask%20Astro/2011/01/Blazar%20vs,-d-,%20quasar.aspx 2 http://cosmology.carnegiescience.edu/timeline/1963 3 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:PKS_1127-145_X-rays.jpg 4 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Quasar_HE_1104-1805.jpg 5 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blazar View high resolution

thenewenlightenmentage:

What are Quasars and Blazars?

Blazars and quasars are both subclasses of active galactic nuclei (AGN).

Blazars and quasars are intrinsically the same object — a supermassive black hole with a surrounding accretion disk, producing a jet — but seen at different orientation angles with respect to the jet’s axis.1

Quasar is short for Quasi Stellar Radio Source.

History

The discovery of Quasars in 1963 provided a final piece of evidence that undermined the Steady State theory of the universe, and supported the Big Bang.  Maarten Schmidt, a Caltech astronomer working at Mt. Palomar Observatory, was credited with discovering the most distant object observed to date—so bright that it was mistaken for a star; but it was billion light years away.  Because of the Doppler shift, the characteristic lines with which we identify stars were not at the expected wavelengths.   

Schmidt’s discovery capped an exciting period in which the distance scale of the universe was expanded nearly tenfold, thanks to the contributions of Walter Baade, Alan Sandage, the new science of radio astronomy, and the magnificent telescopes of Mount Palomar.

Not all radio sources can be seen in visible light.  Many are thought to be distant galaxies.  The Sun emits radio waves that are easily detected because it is so close to us, but most stars are not bright radio sources. In 1963 Maarten Schmidt was studying radio Source 3C 273.  It was unusual because the radio signals appeared to be coming from a star. At first the spectrum of the star was puzzling.   Schmidt could not figure out what elements produced the bight spectral lines.  Then he realized that the unfamiliar lines were simply the bright emission lines from hydrogen gas that had been shifted to different wavelengths. According to Hubble’s Law, an object with that red shift must be located billions of light-years away. It must be brighter than a million galaxies to appear as bright as a star at that great distance.

3C 273 came to be known as a quasar, short for quasi-stellar radio source, since it looks like a star, but cannot possibly be one since it is so bright.  In subsequent years many more quasars were found, including some much further away than 3C 273. These findings dealt a serious blow the Steady State theory, which proposed that the universe is more or less uniform, so that young galaxies should be distributed evenly, with some close and some far away.  If quasars are only found at great distances, they could very well be young galaxies, since we are seeing them much earlier in the history of the universe. (Light from an object a billion light years away takes a billion years to reach us.)  Therefore, Maarten Schmidt’s discovery of quasars added another important piece of evidence in favor of the Big Bang theory.  It also amazed the readers of Time magazine that astronomers could look so far away in space and time.2

Known Quasars and Blazars

 PKS 1127-145

4

HE 1104-1805

5

The largest known structure in the universe is a large group of quasars rightly called the LQG (Large Quasar Group).  It’s four billion light-years from end to end! (Read More)

For more Quasars click here.

Some examples of blazars include 3C 454.3, 3C 273, BL Lacertae, PKS 2155-304, Markarian 421, and Markarian 501. The latter two are also called “TeV Blazars” for their high energy (teraelectron-volt range) gamma-ray emission.5

1 http://www.astronomy.com/en/News-Observing/Ask%20Astro/2011/01/Blazar%20vs,-d-,%20quasar.aspx

2 http://cosmology.carnegiescience.edu/timeline/1963

3 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:PKS_1127-145_X-rays.jpg

4 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Quasar_HE_1104-1805.jpg

5 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blazar

timothydelaghetto: sofapizza: oh deer this is my stop this mah stop doe View high resolution

timothydelaghetto:

sofapizza:

oh deer this is my stop

this mah stop doe

stillnotdavid:

It’s great to see that some people don’t forget.

(Source: lickypickystickyme)

flamingh0e: chlochlotaco: thisisrapeculture: mygreenchemicaldayofromance: mendthebroken: acid-child: supergreak: halffizzbin: thechronicleofshe: pinkhairedlesbianadventures: coachela: rehability: sadaholic: loudwhisperss: teenage-drrtbag: If only all men were like this. If men were all like this the world population rate would be so slow There are guys like this you’re just too busy putting them in the fucking friend zone to see that ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ reblog for the comment Oh hell no you better listen the fuck up dickwads I was about to go to sleep and then this bullshit showed up on my dash and you have all earned yourselves fedoras so sit down, shut up, and educate your stupid asses. “Putting them in the friendzone”? I’m sorry did you mean “I was nice to a girl and I cared about her and I’m bitter because she didn’t want me back?” Or was it “I believe that if I love another person they’re a bitch for just wanting to be friends.” Perhaps it was “I treated her (or pretended to, rather) like a person instead of a sexual object and now she’s not being a sexual object for me like I deserve.” No, wait, it’s “friendship with a girl makes me angry because I’m a self-entitled shithead who feels like if I want to be with a girl she has to accept that regardless of her feelings or else she’s a total bitch.” The friendzone is the concept that a girl wanting to be your friend is somehow this inherently awful thing. Like, wow, did it occur to you that she thought you were, I dunno, FRIENDS? Did it occur to you that maybe she doesn’t feel romantically towards you but she still wants you to be part of her life because she thinks you’re a great person? I mean, if this is your reaction you’re wrong, because if you think friendzoning is a thing then clearly you’re a fucktrumpet but that’s beside the point. Women are not machines you put niceness coins into until sex comes out. There are no punchcards to fill out to get to sex that you are apparently entitled to. There is no friendzone, there are only people who don’t know how to behave like they’re not five-year-olds who don’t know how to take “no” for an answer. Now I’m going to sleep. Disrespectful misogynistic asswagons. Wow. Fucktrumpet, Asswagons? You are amazing at swearing. Like seriously amazing. FUCKTRUMPET. Women are not machines you put niceness coins into until sex comes out.  HOLY FUCK I LOVE YOU everyone better read that long amazing comment!!!!!!! REBLOGGING FOR THE COMMENT. Also, there is nothing wrong with casual consensual sex. This goes for both men and women. You don’t have to love the person you’re sleeping with in order to sleep with them. Sex is intimate but it’s not always romantic. Nobody is a slut or a whore for just casually sleeping with someone. Safety and consent are mandatory; love is not. THAT COMMENTARY Oh hello yeah sleep with who you want reblogging because fucktrumpet View high resolution

flamingh0e:

chlochlotaco:

thisisrapeculture:

mygreenchemicaldayofromance:

mendthebroken:

acid-child:

supergreak:

halffizzbin:

thechronicleofshe:

pinkhairedlesbianadventures:

coachela:

rehability:

sadaholic:

loudwhisperss:

teenage-drrtbag:

If only all men were like this.

If men were all like this the world population rate would be so slow

There are guys like this you’re just too busy putting them in the fucking friend zone to see that

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

reblog for the comment

Oh hell no you better listen the fuck up dickwads

I was about to go to sleep and then this bullshit showed up on my dash and you have all earned yourselves fedoras so sit down, shut up, and educate your stupid asses.

“Putting them in the friendzone”? I’m sorry did you mean “I was nice to a girl and I cared about her and I’m bitter because she didn’t want me back?” Or was it “I believe that if I love another person they’re a bitch for just wanting to be friends.” Perhaps it was “I treated her (or pretended to, rather) like a person instead of a sexual object and now she’s not being a sexual object for me like I deserve.” No, wait, it’s “friendship with a girl makes me angry because I’m a self-entitled shithead who feels like if I want to be with a girl she has to accept that regardless of her feelings or else she’s a total bitch.”

The friendzone is the concept that a girl wanting to be your friend is somehow this inherently awful thing. Like, wow, did it occur to you that she thought you were, I dunno, FRIENDS? Did it occur to you that maybe she doesn’t feel romantically towards you but she still wants you to be part of her life because she thinks you’re a great person? I mean, if this is your reaction you’re wrong, because if you think friendzoning is a thing then clearly you’re a fucktrumpet but that’s beside the point.

Women are not machines you put niceness coins into until sex comes out. There are no punchcards to fill out to get to sex that you are apparently entitled to.

There is no friendzone, there are only people who don’t know how to behave like they’re not five-year-olds who don’t know how to take “no” for an answer.

Now I’m going to sleep. Disrespectful misogynistic asswagons.

Wow. Fucktrumpet, Asswagons? You are amazing at swearing. Like seriously amazing.

FUCKTRUMPET.

Women are not machines you put niceness coins into until sex comes out. 

HOLY FUCK I LOVE YOU

everyone better read that long amazing comment!!!!!!!

REBLOGGING FOR THE COMMENT. Also, there is nothing wrong with casual consensual sex. This goes for both men and women. You don’t have to love the person you’re sleeping with in order to sleep with them. Sex is intimate but it’s not always romantic. Nobody is a slut or a whore for just casually sleeping with someone. Safety and consent are mandatory; love is not.

THAT COMMENTARY

Oh hello yeah sleep with who you want

reblogging because fucktrumpet